Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Llm Latency Tracker vs Mcp Grafana
In-depth architectural comparison of the Llm Latency Tracker and Mcp Grafana MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Llm Latency Tracker
Monitoring · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Mcp Grafana
Monitoring · Local stdio
Quality: 68/100 (Great) | Auth: API Key required
Verdict Summary: Choose Llm Latency Tracker if you need specialized Monitoring tools running via a local process. Choose Mcp Grafana if your workspace requires Monitoring integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
L
Choose Llm Latency Tracker when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Choose Mcp Grafana when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: API Key required (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
- You have access to required keys:
GRAFANA_URL, GRAFANA_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN. - Primary tools included: add_activity_to_incident, alerting_manage_routing, alerting_manage_rules.
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Llm Latency Tracker Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Mcp Grafana Tools (65)
add_activity_to_incident
Add a note (userNote activity) to an existing incident's timeline using its ID. The note body can include URLs which will be attached as context. Use this to add context to an incident.
alerting_manage_routing
Manage Grafana alerting routing configuration, including notification policies, contact points and time intervals.
Notification policies define how alerts are grouped, routed, and which contact points receive them.
Time intervals define active/mute periods for alert notifications.
When to use:
- Understanding how alerts are routed to contact points/receivers
- Debugging why an alert went to a specific receiver
- Checking grouping, timing, or mute interval settings
When NOT to use:
- Checking alert rule configuration or state (use alerting_manage_rules)
alerting_manage_rules
Manage Grafana alert rules with full CRUD capabilities and filtering.
When to use:
- Understanding why an alert is or isn't firing
- Auditing alert rule configuration (queries, conditions, labels, notification settings)
- Finding alert rules by state, folder, group, or name
- Creating, updating, or deleting alert rules
- Comparing rule versions to see what changed
When NOT to use:
- Checking how alerts are routed to receivers (use alerting_manage_routing)
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Llm Latency Tracker Configuration
Mcp Grafana Configuration
Frequently Asked Questions
More alternatives to Llm Latency TrackerMore alternatives to Mcp GrafanaMonitoring category hubCanonical compare URL