Lithtrix vs Deepsky Aviation Regulations

In-depth architectural comparison of the Lithtrix and Deepsky Aviation Regulations MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Lithtrix when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lithtrix Details

Choose Deepsky Aviation Regulations when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Deepsky Aviation Regulations Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Lithtrix Developer Tools	Deepsky Aviation Regulations Developer Tools
Summary	Agent-native web search with credibility scoring. Free tier: 300 calls, no card required.	Free no-key search over CASA, FAA, EASA & ICAO aviation regulations. By Deepsky (deepskyai.com).
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lithtrix": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "lithtrix-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "deepsky-aviation-regulations": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons