What is the key difference between Literature Review Council and Mcp?

Literature Review Council belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while Mcp belongs to the Developer Tools category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Literature Review Council or Mcp in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Literature Review Council and Mcp free or paid?

Literature Review Council operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Mcp operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Literature Review Council lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Mcp lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Literature Review Council and Mcp together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Literature Review Council or Mcp in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Literature Review Council and Mcp free to use, or do they require API keys?

Literature Review Council is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Mcp operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Literature Review Council and Mcp at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both literature-review-council and mcp-46 as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Literature Review Council has a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. Mcp holds a Quality Score of 43 /100 ( Fair ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Literature Review Council vs Mcp

In-depth architectural comparison of the Literature Review Council and Mcp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Literature Review Council

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Mcp

Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 43/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Literature Review Council if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Mcp if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Literature Review Council when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Literature Review Council Details

Choose Mcp when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Mcp Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	L Literature Review Council Developer Tools	Mcp Developer Tools
Summary	Multi-agent literature review: research, peer review, and synthesize grounded reports.	Consult a multi-model panel on contested decisions via MCP: architecture, plan review, strategy.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Literature Review Council Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Mcp Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Literature Review Council Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "literature-review-council": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "literature-review-council"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Mcp Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-46": {
      "url": "https://mumo.chat/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Literature Review Council is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Mcp belongs to Developer Tools using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Literature Review Council when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Mcp when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Literature Review Council More alternatives to Mcp Developer Tools category hub