Linkly vs NanoLink MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Linkly and NanoLink MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Linkly when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: create_link, update_link, delete_link.

Explore Linkly Details

Choose NanoLink MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: shorten_link, shorten_links_bulk, list_links.

Explore NanoLink MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Linkly Developer Tools	NanoLink MCP mahmoudhalimeh Developer Tools
Summary	Create and manage short links, track clicks, and automate URL management	Create and manage Linkonda short links and QR codes, with no per-visitor tracking.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "linkly": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote",
        "https://mcp.linklyhq.com"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-233": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@veranoapp/linkonda-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons