LinkedMash vs Reach MCP — LinkedIn for AI agents

In-depth architectural comparison of the LinkedMash and Reach MCP — LinkedIn for AI agents MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose LinkedMash when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore LinkedMash Details

R

Choose Reach MCP — LinkedIn for AI agents when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Reach MCP — LinkedIn for AI agents Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	LinkedMash Social Media	R Reach MCP — LinkedIn for AI agents Social Media
Summary	Search, label and export your LinkedIn saved posts, then draft, schedule and publish from them.	LinkedIn for AI agents: inbox, invitations, Sales Navigator search, posts. Quotas and webhooks.
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "linkedmash-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@linkedmash/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "reach-mcp-linkedin-for-ai-agents": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "reach-mcp-linkedin-for-ai-agents"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons