Linkedin Outreach MCP vs LinkedNav

In-depth architectural comparison of the Linkedin Outreach MCP and LinkedNav MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Linkedin Outreach MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Linkedin Outreach MCP Details

Choose LinkedNav when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore LinkedNav Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Linkedin Outreach MCP Social Media	LinkedNav Social Media
Summary	AI-powered linkedin outreach MCP server for agents. Supports generate connection request, ge...	Run LinkedIn outreach from your AI chat: find leads, launch campaigns, send, and reply.
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "linkedin-outreach-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "linkednav": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "linkednav"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons