Linear MCP (multi Wor… vs Zephyr Scale MCP | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Linear MCP (multi Workspace, PAT auth) vs Zephyr Scale MCP
In-depth architectural comparison of the Linear MCP (multi Workspace, PAT auth) and Zephyr Scale MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Linear MCP (multi Workspace, PAT auth)
Workplace & Productivity · Local stdio
Quality: 44/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Zephyr Scale MCP
Workplace & Productivity · Local stdio
Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Linear MCP (multi Workspace, PAT auth) if you need specialized Workplace & Productivity tools running via a local process. Choose Zephyr Scale MCP if your workspace requires Workplace & Productivity integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Linear MCP (multi Workspace, PAT auth) when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Linear MCP (multi Workspace, PAT auth) is categorized under Workplace & Productivity and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Zephyr Scale MCP belongs to Workplace & Productivity using local stdio subprocess. Select Linear MCP (multi Workspace, PAT auth) when you need capabilities focused on workplace & productivity and Zephyr Scale MCP when you require tools for workplace & productivity.