Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
License Checker vs Readhn
In-depth architectural comparison of the License Checker and Readhn MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
License Checker
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Readhn
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose License Checker if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Readhn if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
L
Choose License Checker when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
R
Choose Readhn when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
License Checker Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Readhn Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
License Checker Configuration
Readhn Configuration