LibreLink Up (CGM) vs Kin

In-depth architectural comparison of the LibreLink Up (CGM) and Kin MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose LibreLink Up (CGM) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore LibreLink Up (CGM) Details

Choose Kin when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kin Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	LibreLink Up (CGM) Developer Tools	Kin Developer Tools
Summary	Glucose readings from your LibreLink Up sensor: graph, logbook, stats and summaries (read-only). Sec	Semantic code retrieval over a graph of entities, relationships, changes, and provenance.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "librelink-up-cgm": {
      "url": "https://claude.ai/customize/connectors?modal=add-custom-connector&mcpName=LibreLink%20Up%20(CGM)&mcpServerUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.mcp.ai%2Fp_librelink"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kin": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@kinlab/kin"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons