The full upstream README, mirrored here for reference. Install config, tool schemas, adoption signals, and an original overview live on the Lians Agent Memory listing page.
Recover the task. Reject stale state. Block unsupported done.
Quickstart · Why Lians · ContinuityBench · Install · Docs · Issues
The current-state and completion guard for AI coding agents.
Lians recovers interrupted agent work, rejects stale task state, and blocks
done until the current task is ready for human review.
Your agent can forget the chat. It cannot forget what is finished, what changed, or what still has to pass.
READY FOR HUMAN REVIEW is a handoff to a person, never a
claim that the work is correct, approved, or safe to deploy.Lians works with your existing AI account and editor. It does not replace your model, Git, CI, repository instructions, or human review.
The trust model is deliberately strict. measured_local, measured_ci, and
human_confirmed evidence can satisfy a criterion. agent_attested and
inferred_activity records remain useful context but cannot open the review
gate. An agent cannot promote its own checkpoint into a trusted class. Trusted
CI evidence requires an exact GitHub attestation and commit match plus an
interactive check-to-criterion mapping; human evidence requires interactive
confirmation. Read why Lians exists, the full
Lians Guard product contract, and the current market
pressure test.
Choose the AI tool you already use:
| Tool | Fastest setup |
|---|---|
| Codex app, CLI, or IDE | One command |
| Claude Code | Two plugin commands |
| Cursor | One-click MCP install |
| Other MCP clients | Minimal MCP setup |
For example, after installing uv, connect Codex with:
Restart Codex, then save one safe project fact and recover it in a fresh chat.
Local memory is stored in ~/.lians/mcp.db by default. This is the available
free recovery path; the full Guard workflow is currently a developer preview.
Follow the complete quickstart for setup, recovery, correction, deletion, and the Guard preview boundary.
Lians can generate a bounded project handoff instead of replaying a transcript:
The handoff is derived from current Lians state, not a manually maintained summary. Agent-reported work remains visible without being mislabeled as verified completion.
Native memories are convenient when work stays inside one product. General memory is no longer a scarce category. Lians uses local memory for recovery, then focuses on the expensive gap: current task state and evidence-backed readiness.
The current competitive landscape pressure tests this position against native Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Entire, Factory, and AI review workflows.
| Approach | Best fit | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Native tool memory | One AI tool, minimal setup | Usually stays inside that vendor |
AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md | Stable repository instructions | Must be maintained manually |
| Transcript replay | Reconstructing one conversation | Large, noisy, and may revive stale decisions |
| Free Lians recovery | Resume current project context across supported tools | Requires a local connection to each tool |
| Lians Guard | Detect stale state and gate readiness with typed evidence | Team workflow is still in developer preview |
Lians is not claiming that every project needs a separate memory layer. See the honest comparison and decision guide.
Lians is under active development. Available recovery features and preview Guard features are separated here so the repository does not imply a production guarantee that does not exist yet.
| Capability | Status |
|---|---|
| Local memory through MCP and Python | Available |
| Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor local recovery setup | Available |
| Inspect, correct, and confirmed permanent deletion | Available |
| Bounded context and signed selection receipts | Available |
| Automatic Claude-to-Codex project handoff | Beta |
| Typed evidence and evidence-backed task gate | Developer preview |
| Local Git workspace fingerprint on checkpoints | Developer preview |
| Automatic stale evidence invalidation | In development |
| Attested GitHub Actions evidence intake | Developer preview |
| Local Guard reporting | Developer preview |
| Shared team queue | Planned |
| Cross-platform clean-install CI | Required by the new Guard workflow; first hosted run pending |
| Guided desktop installer and local control center | Release candidate |
The macOS and Windows desktop builds remain release candidates pending platform signing and notarization. See the desktop preview boundary.
The included Claude-to-Codex continuity fixture recovered 10/10 expected facts, exposed 0 stale facts as current, and produced a 231-token handoff. These are bounded beta results, not a promise that every live coding session extracts perfectly. Run the experiment.
The developing ContinuityBench v0.1 publishes the proposed cross-agent, freshness, correction, erasure, provenance, and boundedness test contract. Its current Lians fixture is evidence for that fixture only; it is not presented as a completed competitor leaderboard.
A separate live test saved a synthetic project fact through Cursor, recalled it in a new Cursor chat and a fresh Claude Code session, and confirmed it was gone after deletion. Read the test method.
The Guard correctness benchmark exercises missing evidence, unknown criteria,
failed constraints, blockers, stale updates, and drift signals. It is a local,
deterministic test of the configured policy, not proof of semantic correctness
or a production outcome. Run packages/lians-easy/benchmarks/task_contract_correctness.py
to inspect the cases.
Use the local Python SDK inside an application:
See the install guide for TypeScript, Go, Java, C, framework integrations, and self-hosting.
Running a class, club, hackathon, or campus developer group? Use the student and community kit. Contributors and package integrators can start with Supported paths and repository status.
Lians also includes tools for project-scoped agent handoffs, signed selection and review receipts, local research and browser briefs, temporal reconstruction, lineage, information barriers, confirmed erasure, and bounded formal checks. These capabilities are useful for advanced or governed deployments but are not required for the starter memory workflow.
Read CONTRIBUTING.md before opening a pull request. Feature ideas, integration requests, and reproducible bugs are welcome in GitHub Issues.
If Lians helps your workflow, star the repository so other AI-tool users can find it.
Apache 2.0. See LICENSE.