Lianban A Share Review vs Kernelcad

In-depth architectural comparison of the Lianban A Share Review and Kernelcad MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

L

Choose Lianban A Share Review when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lianban A Share Review Details

Choose Kernelcad when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kernelcad Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	L Lianban A Share Review Developer Tools	Kernelcad Developer Tools
Summary	连板网A股复盘数据: 连板天梯/题材/情绪周期/龙虎榜游资/个股涨停史 (A-share daily review, free read-only)	Agent-first CAD: editable .kcad.ts source, deterministic review, OpenCASCADE kernel.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lianban-a-share-review": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "lianban-a-share-review"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kernelcad": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "kernelcad",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons