Lex — Temporal Luxembourg and EU Law vs Nalegalu MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Lex — Temporal Luxembourg and EU Law and Nalegalu MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Lex — Temporal Luxembourg and EU Law when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lex — Temporal Luxembourg and EU Law Details

Choose Nalegalu MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Nalegalu MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Lex — Temporal Luxembourg and EU Law Legal	Nalegalu MCP Legal
Summary	Temporal search and comparison for official Luxembourg and reviewed EU law, with provenance.	Semantic search over Polish law and case law, citing the exact in-force article.
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lex-temporal-luxembourg-and-eu-law": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote@0.1.38"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nalegalu-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "nalegalu-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons