Lex — Temporal Luxembourg and EU Law vs Fedlex MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Lex — Temporal Luxembourg and EU Law and Fedlex MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Lex — Temporal Luxembourg and EU Law when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lex — Temporal Luxembourg and EU Law Details

Choose Fedlex MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Fedlex MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Lex — Temporal Luxembourg and EU Law Legal	Fedlex MCP Legal
Summary	Temporal search and comparison for official Luxembourg and reviewed EU law, with provenance.	Swiss federal law via Fedlex SPARQL endpoint
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lex-temporal-luxembourg-and-eu-law": {
      "url": "https://law.soufien.lu/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fedlex-mcp-2": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "fedlex-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons