Leteo vs Sync82

In-depth architectural comparison of the Leteo and Sync82 MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Leteo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Local SQLite-backed memory, MCP interface with 22 tools, Project-scoped knowledge.

Explore Leteo Details

S

Choose Sync82 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_projects, create_project, delete_project.

Explore Sync82 Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Leteo Databases	S Sync82 Databases
Summary	Persistent memory for AI coding agents: one Rust binary, one local SQLite database.	Persistent, structured project memory for AI coding agents, stored locally in SQLite.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "leteo": {
      "command": "bunx",
      "args": [
        "@asanabrial/leteo"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sync82": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sync82"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons