Leadenrich MCP vs Apollo MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Leadenrich MCP and Apollo MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Leadenrich MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Leadenrich MCP Details

Choose Apollo MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Apollo MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Leadenrich MCP Developer Tools	Apollo MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	Waterfall lead enrichment — cascades Apollo, Clearbit, and Hunter for max coverage	MCP server that exposes GraphQL operations as tools for AI models.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "leadenrich-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "leadenrich-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "apollo-mcp-server": {
      "url": "https://mcptoplist.com/badge/io.github.apollographql%2Fgraphos-mcp-tools.svg)](https://mcptoplist.com/server/io.github.apollographql%2Fgraphos-mcp-tools"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons