Lazyrelay MCP Server vs Schedulala

In-depth architectural comparison of the Lazyrelay MCP Server and Schedulala MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Lazyrelay MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lazyrelay MCP Server Details

Choose Schedulala when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Schedulala Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Lazyrelay MCP Server Developer Tools	Schedulala Developer Tools
Summary	Schedule social posts, check Proof-of-Publish status, pull analytics, and read mentions.	Schedule and publish social posts to 12 platforms with first comments, analytics, and listening.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lazyrelay-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "lazyrelay-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "schedulala": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "schedulala"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons