Lazyrelay MCP Server vs Antwork

In-depth architectural comparison of the Lazyrelay MCP Server and Antwork MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Lazyrelay MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Lazyrelay MCP Server Details

Choose Antwork when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Antwork Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Lazyrelay MCP Server Developer Tools	Antwork Developer Tools
Summary	Schedule social posts, check Proof-of-Publish status, pull analytics, and read mentions.	Draft, schedule, and publish social posts for your workspace straight from your AI.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lazyrelay-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "lazyrelay-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "antwork-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "antwork-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons