In-depth architectural comparison of the Law.AI — Lawyer Search and Mcp Sudact MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Law.AI — Lawyer Search
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Mcp Sudact
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 60/100 (Good) | Auth: API Key required
Verdict Summary: Choose Law.AI — Lawyer Search if you need specialized Legal tools running via a local process. Choose Mcp Sudact if your workspace requires Legal integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Law.AI — Lawyer Search when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Law.AI — Lawyer Search is categorized under Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Mcp Sudact belongs to Legal using local stdio subprocess. Select Law.AI — Lawyer Search when you need capabilities focused on legal and Mcp Sudact when you require tools for legal.
List all available practice areas with lawyer counts.
get_jurisdictions
List U.S. states and territories with coverage numbers.
Mcp Sudact Tools (2)
search_cases
Полнотекстовый поиск судебных дел РФ — как родной поиск на sudact.ru.
Ищет по тексту документа с фильтрами по статье закона, типу суда, инстанции и
датам; возвращает реальный total_found и выдачу с case_id/url для последующего
get_citation. Требуется ключ MCP_SUDACT_TOKEN (тариф Pro): движок поиска —
на нашем сервере.
get_citation
Полный текст судебного решения по url карточки sudact.ru или case_id.
Тянет полный текст решения (с сервера), с опциональной анонимизацией ФИО.
Нужно указать url или case_id. Требуется ключ MCP_SUDACT_TOKEN (тариф Pro).