What is the key difference between GhidraMCP and Mcp Threatintel?

GhidraMCP belongs to the Security category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution, while Mcp Threatintel belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution.

How do I install GhidraMCP or Mcp Threatintel in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are GhidraMCP and Mcp Threatintel free or paid?

GhidraMCP operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Mcp Threatintel operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

GhidraMCP lists 5 tools with 2 views and 9,757 GitHub stars. Mcp Threatintel lists 0 tools with 1 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both GhidraMCP and Mcp Threatintel together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install GhidraMCP or Mcp Threatintel in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are GhidraMCP and Mcp Threatintel free to use, or do they require API keys?

GhidraMCP is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Mcp Threatintel operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both GhidraMCP and Mcp Threatintel at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both lauriewired-ghidramcp and mcp-threatintel as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, GhidraMCP has a Quality Score of 56 /100 ( Good ) with 2 views, 0 installs, and 9,757 GitHub stars. Mcp Threatintel holds a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 1 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

GhidraMCP vs Mcp Threatintel

In-depth architectural comparison of the GhidraMCP and Mcp Threatintel MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

GhidraMCP

Security · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 56/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required

Mcp Threatintel

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose GhidraMCP if you need specialized Security tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Mcp Threatintel if your workspace requires Security integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose GhidraMCP when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: Decompile binaries using Ghidra, Rename methods and data automatically, List methods, classes, imports, exports.

Explore GhidraMCP Details

Choose Mcp Threatintel when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Mcp Threatintel Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	GhidraMCP LaurieWired Security	M Mcp Threatintel Security
Summary	A Model Context Protocol server for Ghidra that enables LLMs to autonomously reverse engineer applications. Provides tools for decompiling binaries, renaming methods and data, and listing methods, classes, imports, and exports.	Unified threat intel - OTX, AbuseIPDB, GreyNoise, abuse.ch, Feodo Tracker
Category & Scope	Security	Security

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

GhidraMCP Tools (5)

Decompile binaries using Ghidra

Rename methods and data automatically

List methods, classes, imports, exports

MCP server with Ghidra plugin

Configurable HTTP server port

Mcp Threatintel Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

GhidraMCP Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lauriewired-ghidramcp": {
      "url": "https://img.shields.io/badge/License-Apache%202.0-blue.svg)](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0"
    }
  }
}

Mcp Threatintel Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-threatintel": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-threatintel"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

GhidraMCP is categorized under Security and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Mcp Threatintel belongs to Security using local stdio subprocess. Select GhidraMCP when you need capabilities focused on security and Mcp Threatintel when you require tools for security.

More alternatives to GhidraMCP More alternatives to Mcp Threatintel Security category hub