What is the key difference between GhidraMCP and Authbox?

GhidraMCP belongs to the Security category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution, while Authbox belongs to the Security category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install GhidraMCP or Authbox in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are GhidraMCP and Authbox free or paid?

GhidraMCP operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Authbox operates under a Free / Open Source model (other).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

GhidraMCP lists 5 tools with 2 views and 9,757 GitHub stars. Authbox lists 6 tools with 1 views and 5 GitHub stars.

Can I use both GhidraMCP and Authbox together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install GhidraMCP or Authbox in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are GhidraMCP and Authbox free to use, or do they require API keys?

GhidraMCP is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Authbox operates under a Free / Open Source model with other . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both GhidraMCP and Authbox at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both lauriewired-ghidramcp and marucie-authbox as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, GhidraMCP has a Quality Score of 56 /100 ( Good ) with 2 views, 0 installs, and 9,757 GitHub stars. Authbox holds a Quality Score of 52 /100 ( Good ) with 1 views, 0 installs, and 5 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

GhidraMCP vs Authbox

In-depth architectural comparison of the GhidraMCP and Authbox MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

GhidraMCP

Security · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 56/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required

Authbox

Security · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 52/100 (Good) | Auth: other

Verdict Summary: Choose GhidraMCP if you need specialized Security tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Authbox if your workspace requires Security integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose GhidraMCP when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: Decompile binaries using Ghidra, Rename methods and data automatically, List methods, classes, imports, exports.

Explore GhidraMCP Details

Choose Authbox when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: other (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: MCP gateway over WebSocket, Policy controls for scope, rate limits, and time windows, Step-up approval for agent access.

Explore Authbox Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	GhidraMCP LaurieWired Security	Authbox MARUCIE Security
Summary	A Model Context Protocol server for Ghidra that enables LLMs to autonomously reverse engineer applications. Provides tools for decompiling binaries, renaming methods and data, and listing methods, classes, imports, and exports.	Zero-knowledge password manager with MCP credential gateway. BIP-39 seed phrase recovery, deterministic passwords, policy-gated AI agent access (scope, rate limits, time windows, step-up approval), 70+ API key providers, and hash-chain audit trail. Go + Next.js + TypeScript.
Category & Scope

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

GhidraMCP Tools (5)

Decompile binaries using Ghidra

Rename methods and data automatically

List methods, classes, imports, exports

MCP server with Ghidra plugin

Configurable HTTP server port

Authbox Tools (6)

MCP gateway over WebSocket

Policy controls for scope, rate limits, and time windows

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

GhidraMCP Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lauriewired-ghidramcp": {
      "url": "https://img.shields.io/badge/License-Apache%202.0-blue.svg)](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0"
    }
  }
}

Authbox Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "marucie-authbox": {
      "url": "https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-blue.svg"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

GhidraMCP is categorized under Security and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Authbox belongs to Security using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select GhidraMCP when you need capabilities focused on security and Authbox when you require tools for security.

More alternatives to GhidraMCP More alternatives to Authbox Security category hub