Latam Validate vs Proibidos BACEN

In-depth architectural comparison of the Latam Validate and Proibidos BACEN MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

L

Choose Latam Validate when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: validate_clabe, validate_cnpj, validate_cpf.

Explore Latam Validate Details

Choose Proibidos BACEN when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Proibidos BACEN Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	L Latam Validate Developer Tools	Proibidos BACEN Developer Tools
Summary	Validate LatAm IDs: Mexican CLABE, Brazilian CNPJ/CPF checksums + BrasilAPI company/CEP/bank lookups	Checks whether a person or company is on the Central Bank's general banned list from the CPF or CNPJ
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "latam-validate": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "latam-validate"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "proibidos-bacen": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "proibidos-bacen"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons