Larnitech vs Jettyd MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Larnitech and Jettyd MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Larnitech when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Home Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Larnitech Details

Choose Jettyd MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Home Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_devices, read_device, send_command.

Explore Jettyd MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Larnitech Home Automation	Jettyd MCP Home Automation
Summary	Read, watch and safely control Larnitech smart-home controllers over the API2 protocol.	Connect AI agents to IoT devices — read sensors, send commands, manage ESP32 fleets.
Category & Scope	Home Automation	Home Automation
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "larnitech": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "larnitech-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-103": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@jettyd/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons