MCP Server Nationalparks vs Nasa Eonet

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Server Nationalparks and Nasa Eonet MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Server Nationalparks when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Environment & Nature domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: NPS_API_KEY.
• Primary tools included: stateCode, q, limit.

Explore MCP Server Nationalparks Details

Choose Nasa Eonet when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Environment & Nature domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Nasa Eonet Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Server Nationalparks KyrieTangSheng Environment & Nature	Nasa Eonet Environment & Nature
Summary	National Park Service API integration providing latest information of park details, alerts, visitor centers, campgrounds, and events for U.S. National Parks	NASA EONET MCP — Earth Observatory Natural Event Tracker
Category & Scope	Environment & Nature

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kyrietangsheng-mcp-server-nationalparks": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-server-nationalparks"
      ],
      "env": {
        "NPS_API_KEY": "YOUR_NPS_API_KEY_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nasa-eonet": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@pipeworx/mcp-nasa-eonet"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons