In-depth architectural comparison of the Hyperliquid Info Mcp and Oathscore MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Hyperliquid Info Mcp
Finance & Fintech · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Oathscore
Finance & Fintech · Local stdio
Quality: 59/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Hyperliquid Info Mcp if you need specialized Finance & Fintech tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Oathscore if your workspace requires Finance & Fintech integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Hyperliquid Info Mcp when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
You have access to required keys: HYPERLIQUID_ACCOUNT_ADDRESS.
Primary tools included: User-specific queries for positions, orders, trades, funding, fees, and staking, Market data including mid prices, L2 order book snapshots, and candlestick data, Metadata retrieval for perpetual and spot markets.
An MCP server that provides real-time data and insights from the Hyperliquid perp DEX for use in bots, dashboards, and analytics.
The trust layer for AI trading agents. Real-time world state (exchange status, VIX/VVIX/SKEW, economic events) in one call, plus independent quality ratings (0-100) for financial data APIs. 8 MCP tools.
Hyperliquid Info Mcp is categorized under Finance & Fintech and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Oathscore belongs to Finance & Fintech using local stdio subprocess. Select Hyperliquid Info Mcp when you need capabilities focused on finance & fintech and Oathscore when you require tools for finance & fintech.