What is the key difference between Srunx and Prover?

Srunx belongs to the Code Execution category with local stdio execution, while Prover belongs to the Code Execution category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Srunx or Prover in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Srunx and Prover free or paid?

Srunx operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Prover operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Srunx lists 6 tools with 4 views and 16 GitHub stars. Prover lists 3 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Srunx and Prover together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Srunx or Prover in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Srunx and Prover free to use, or do they require API keys?

Srunx is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Prover operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Srunx and Prover at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both ksterx-srunx and prover as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Srunx has a Quality Score of 56 /100 ( Good ) with 4 views, 0 installs, and 16 GitHub stars. Prover holds a Quality Score of 48 /100 ( Fair ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Srunx vs Prover

In-depth architectural comparison of the Srunx and Prover MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Srunx

Code Execution · Local stdio

Quality: 56/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required

Prover

Code Execution · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 48/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Srunx if you need specialized Code Execution tools running via a local process. Choose Prover if your workspace requires Code Execution integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Srunx when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Code Execution domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
You have access to required keys: SRUNX_SSH_PROFILE.
Primary tools included: Unified CLI for SLURM commands and job management, YAML workflow orchestration with dependency graphs and parameter sweeps, Transparent SSH remote cluster support with profile management.

Explore Srunx Details

Choose Prover when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Code Execution domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: lean4_build, lean4_prove_theorems, lean4_get_job_status.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Srunx ksterx Code Execution	Prover Code Execution
Summary	MCP server for the SLURM workload manager. Submit jobs, run YAML workflows, monitor GPU resources, manage SSH profiles, and sync files to remote HPC clusters from natural language. 14 tools spanning local SLURM and SSH-remote clusters; companion CLI and FastAPI Web UI ship in the same package.	Lean 4 MCP server: compile, prove theorems, and formalize math with Mathlib.
Category & Scope	Code Execution

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Srunx Tools (6)

Unified CLI for SLURM commands and job management

YAML workflow orchestration with dependency graphs and parameter sweeps

Transparent SSH remote cluster support with profile management

GPU resource monitoring and Slack notification integration

Container support for Pyxis, Apptainer, and Singularity

Web dashboard and Python API included

Prover Tools (3)

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Srunx Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ksterx-srunx": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--from"
      ],
      "env": {
        "SRUNX_SSH_PROFILE": "YOUR_SRUNX_SSH_PROFILE_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Prover Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "prover": {
      "url": "https://prover.axiomatic-ai.com/mcp/"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Srunx is categorized under Code Execution and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Prover belongs to Code Execution using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Srunx when you need capabilities focused on code execution and Prover when you require tools for code execution.

More alternatives to Srunx More alternatives to Prover Code Execution category hub