What is the key difference between Krystal Voice Caller and Convalytics?

Krystal Voice Caller belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while Convalytics belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Krystal Voice Caller or Convalytics in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Krystal Voice Caller and Convalytics free or paid?

Krystal Voice Caller operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Convalytics operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Krystal Voice Caller lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Convalytics lists 0 tools with 0 views and 7 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Krystal Voice Caller and Convalytics together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Krystal Voice Caller or Convalytics in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Krystal Voice Caller and Convalytics free to use, or do they require API keys?

Krystal Voice Caller is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Convalytics operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Krystal Voice Caller and Convalytics at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both krystal-voice-caller and convalytics as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Krystal Voice Caller has a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. Convalytics holds a Quality Score of 44 /100 ( Fair ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 7 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Krystal Voice Caller vs Convalytics

In-depth architectural comparison of the Krystal Voice Caller and Convalytics MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Krystal Voice Caller

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Convalytics

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 44/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Krystal Voice Caller if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Convalytics if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Krystal Voice Caller when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Krystal Voice Caller Details

Choose Convalytics when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Convalytics Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	K Krystal Voice Caller Developer Tools	C Convalytics Developer Tools
Summary	Drive a Krystal Voice Caller tenant from Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-aware agent.	Read-only analytics for Convex apps, queryable via MCP from Claude, Cursor, and other clients.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Krystal Voice Caller Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Convalytics Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Krystal Voice Caller Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "krystal-voice-caller": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "krystal-voice-caller"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Convalytics Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "convalytics": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "convalytics"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Krystal Voice Caller is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Convalytics belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Krystal Voice Caller when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Convalytics when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Krystal Voice Caller More alternatives to Convalytics Developer Tools category hub Canonical compare URL