Kryptos vs Trust Tools — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Kryptos vs Trust Tools
In-depth architectural comparison of the Kryptos and Trust Tools MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Kryptos
Finance & Fintech · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 75/100 (Great) | Auth: OAuth 2.0
Trust Tools
Finance & Fintech · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Kryptos if you need specialized Finance & Fintech tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Trust Tools if your workspace requires Finance & Fintech integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Kryptos when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (Paid Service).
Primary tools included: Read portfolio holdings and transaction history, Review tax figures and generate tax reports, Inspect ledgers and chart of accounts.
Kryptos: connect AI agents to your Kryptos workspace. Read your crypto portfolio, transactions across 5,000+ exchanges, wallets and blockchains, capital gains and tax reports, and run crypto bookkeeping with Xero, QuickBooks and Softledger. Hosted remote server (https://mcp.kryptos.io/) with OAuth sign-in.
Website security ratings, token verification, and tamper-evident ledger heads from Obelisk Gate.
Category & Scope
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Kryptos Tools (6)
Read portfolio holdings and transaction history
Review tax figures and generate tax reports
Inspect ledgers and chart of accounts
Fix supported Kryptos data with confirmation
Support Enterprise bookkeeping workflows
Connect through hosted OAuth 2.1 authentication
Trust Tools Tools (8)
scan_trust
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Kryptos is categorized under Finance & Fintech and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Trust Tools belongs to Finance & Fintech using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Kryptos when you need capabilities focused on finance & fintech and Trust Tools when you require tools for finance & fintech.
Run Obelisk's public trust scan on an https URL — TLS and security-header posture, scored as an Obelisk Rating. Read-only, SSRF-guarded.
verify_token
Verify that a JSON Web Token was minted by this Obelisk Gate (ES256, correct issuer) and report its type, subject, assurance, and principal. Never returns secrets.
get_org_rating
Read the public Obelisk Rating (0-100 score, trust band, and trend) for a registered organization by its slug.
verify_agent_run_proof
Verify the structural integrity, agent binding, delegation continuity, and commitments of an Obelisk action-scoped run proof. Does not reveal or infer raw task data.
get_agent_proof
Read an Obelisk agent's public proof vector by opaque proof id. Returns independent claims with freshness and scope; never a scalar trust score or a claim of non-humanness.
transparency_head
Read the current signed transparency head of Obelisk's tamper-evident receipt ledger — pin it and compare later to prove history only extends. Same data as /.well-known/obelisk-transparency.json.
gate_status
Read the Gate's public liveness facts: issuer, served code revision, OIDC availability, and supported protocols. No posture internals.
explain_rating
Explain what an Obelisk Rating number means: its trust band, how the public scan scores, and what typically moves a score. Deterministic by default; pass narrate:true for an additional one-line model-written narrative (cached, public-scope, never required). Pure function of the number — no data is read.