Kosha Model Discovery vs MCP Graphql

In-depth architectural comparison of the Kosha Model Discovery and MCP Graphql MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

K

Choose Kosha Model Discovery when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kosha Model Discovery Details

Choose MCP Graphql when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: introspect-schema, query-graphql.

Explore MCP Graphql Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	K Kosha Model Discovery Developer Tools	MCP Graphql blurrah Developer Tools
Summary	Tells your agent which model to use and what it costs, across 45 providers and local runtimes.	Model Context Protocol server for GraphQL
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kosha-model-discovery": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "kosha-model-discovery"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "blurrah-mcp-graphql": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-graphql"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons