Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Slack MCP Server vs Xadeus QQ MCP
In-depth architectural comparison of the Slack MCP Server and Xadeus QQ MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Slack MCP Server
Communication · Local stdio
Quality: 57/100 (Good) | Auth: other
Xadeus QQ MCP
Communication · Local stdio
Quality: 47/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Slack MCP Server if you need specialized Communication tools running via a local process. Choose Xadeus QQ MCP if your workspace requires Communication integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Slack MCP Server when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: other (Free / Open Source).
- You have access to required keys:
SLACK_MCP_ADD_MESSAGE_TOOL. - Primary tools included: UserID, UserName, RealName.
Choose Xadeus QQ MCP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
- Primary tools included: send_message, send_image, send_voice.
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Slack MCP Server Tools (7)
UserID
User ID (e.g., `U1234567890`)
UserName
Slack username
RealName
User's real name
DisplayName
User's display name
Email
User's email address
Title
User's job title
DMChannelID
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Slack MCP Server Configuration
Xadeus QQ MCP Configuration
