A side-by-side look at the Korean Law MCP and UK Companies House MCP MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Korean Law MCP for legal work as a local process; choose UK Companies House MCP for legal over a hosted endpoint. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Korean Law MCP when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
UK Companies House MCP tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Korean Law MCP is categorized under Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. UK Companies House MCP belongs to Legal and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Pick Korean Law MCP for legal work and UK Companies House MCP for legal.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Korean Law MCP has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. UK Companies House MCP is listed as freemium — a free tier with paid plans. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add korean-law-mcp and uk-companies-house-mcp as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Korean Law MCP has a quality signal of 53/100 (Good) with 2 views, 0 installs and 2,744 GitHub stars. UK Companies House MCP has 40/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.