Kolmo MCP Server vs Faultline

In-depth architectural comparison of the Kolmo MCP Server and Faultline MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

K

Choose Kolmo MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_business_info, list_services, get_service.

Explore Kolmo MCP Server Details

Choose Faultline when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_services, get_service, list_incidents.

Explore Faultline Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	K Kolmo MCP Server Developer Tools	Faultline Developer Tools
Summary	Seattle home remodeling: cost estimates, weather windows, ROI, permits, reviews & quotes.	Check infrastructure health, manage incidents, and run runbooks in Faultline.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kolmo-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "kolmo-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "faultline": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "faultline"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons