Kolada Se vs Xiyan MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Kolada Se and Xiyan MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

K

Choose Kolada Se when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_kpi, list_municipalities, get_data.

Explore Kolada Se Details

Choose Xiyan MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_data.

Explore Xiyan MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	K Kolada Se Databases	Xiyan MCP Server XGenerationLab Databases
Summary	Kolada (RKA) MCP — Sweden's municipal & regional key-performance-indicator (KPI) database.	An MCP server that supports fetching data from a database using natural language queries, powered by XiyanSQL as the text-to-SQL LLM.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kolada-se": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "kolada-se"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "xgenerationlab-xiyan-mcp-server": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "xiyan-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons