Kody vs ScanMalware.com URL Scanner

In-depth architectural comparison of the Kody and ScanMalware.com URL Scanner MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Kody when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kody Details

Choose ScanMalware.com URL Scanner when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ScanMalware.com URL Scanner Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Kody Security	ScanMalware.com URL Scanner Security
Summary	Personal assistant MCP server with search, execute, packages, jobs, secrets, and integrations.	MCP server for ScanMalware.com URL scanning, malware detection, and analysis.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kody": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "create-epicflare"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "scanmalware-com-url-scanner": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "scanmalware-com-url-scanner"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons