Ko MCP vs Brilliant

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ko MCP and Brilliant MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ko MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ko MCP Details

B

Choose Brilliant when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Brilliant Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Ko MCP Developer Tools	B Brilliant Developer Tools
Summary	Real SEC, 13F, insider, congress & macro data your AI agent can cite. Hosted MCP, 24 tools.	Local MCP bridge: your coding agent designs on Brilliant's real vector canvas, fully on 127.0.0.1.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ko-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "wrangler"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-275": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-275"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons