What is the key difference between Klaviyo and Emailable?

Klaviyo belongs to the Communication category with local stdio execution, while Emailable belongs to the Communication category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Klaviyo or Emailable in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Klaviyo and Emailable free or paid?

Klaviyo operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Emailable operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Klaviyo lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Emailable lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Klaviyo and Emailable together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Klaviyo vs Emailable

In-depth architectural comparison of the Klaviyo and Emailable MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Klaviyo

Communication · Local stdio

Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Emailable

Communication · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Klaviyo if you need specialized Communication tools running via a local process. Choose Emailable if your workspace requires Communication integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Klaviyo when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Klaviyo Details

Choose Emailable when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Emailable Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	K Klaviyo Communication	E Emailable Communication
Summary	Klaviyo MCP Pack — wraps the Klaviyo API for email marketing	Emailable MCP — wraps the Emailable email verification API (emailable.com)
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Klaviyo Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Emailable Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Klaviyo Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "klaviyo": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "klaviyo"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Emailable Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "emailable": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "emailable"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Klaviyo is categorized under Communication and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Emailable belongs to Communication using local stdio subprocess. Select Klaviyo when you need capabilities focused on communication and Emailable when you require tools for communication.

More alternatives to Klaviyo More alternatives to Emailable Communication category hub Canonical compare URL

Related MCP Server Comparisons

Popular comparisons with Klaviyo

Popular comparisons with Emailable

H
Emailable vs Hunter