Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Kivgraph vs Oxcode
In-depth architectural comparison of the Kivgraph and Oxcode MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Kivgraph
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Oxcode
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 35/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Kivgraph if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Oxcode if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
K
Choose Kivgraph when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
O
Choose Oxcode when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Kivgraph Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Oxcode Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Kivgraph Configuration
Oxcode Configuration