Kirah Local Services vs Funplay Cocos MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Kirah Local Services and Funplay Cocos MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

K

Choose Kirah Local Services when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kirah Local Services Details

Choose Funplay Cocos MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Funplay Cocos MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	K Kirah Local Services Developer Tools	Funplay Cocos MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Discover local service businesses, compare offerings, and check current availability.	stdio bridge for the local Cocos Creator Editor MCP server from FunplayAI/funplay-cocos-mcp.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kirah-local-services": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "kirah-local-services"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "funplay-cocos-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "funplay-cocos-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons