MCP Remote Call Ping Pong vs Time

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Remote Call Ping Pong and Time MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Remote Call Ping Pong when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Other Tools and Integrations domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: FastAPI backend for remote MCP calls, FastMCP integration, API and SSE transport options.

Explore MCP Remote Call Ping Pong Details

Choose Time when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Other Tools and Integrations domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: create_entities, create_relations, add_observations.

Explore Time Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Remote Call Ping Pong kimtth Other Tools and Integrations	Time VerifiedOther Tools and Integrations
Summary	An experimental and educational app for Ping-pong server demonstrating remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) calls	Time and timezone conversion capabilities.
Category & Scope

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kimtth-mcp-remote-call-ping-pong": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "kimtth-mcp-remote-call-ping-pong"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "time": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons