Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Kerdos X402 Mcp vs Madeonsol
In-depth architectural comparison of the Kerdos X402 Mcp and Madeonsol MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Kerdos X402 Mcp
Finance & Fintech · Local stdio
Quality: 29/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Madeonsol
Finance & Fintech · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Kerdos X402 Mcp if you need specialized Finance & Fintech tools running via a local process. Choose Madeonsol if your workspace requires Finance & Fintech integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
K
Choose Kerdos X402 Mcp when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
M
Choose Madeonsol when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Kerdos X402 Mcp Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Madeonsol Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Kerdos X402 Mcp Configuration
Madeonsol Configuration