KatanA Markdown Linter vs Constitution Lint

In-depth architectural comparison of the KatanA Markdown Linter and Constitution Lint MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose KatanA Markdown Linter when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore KatanA Markdown Linter Details

Choose Constitution Lint when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Constitution Lint Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	KatanA Markdown Linter Monitoring	Constitution Lint Monitoring
Summary	Markdown linter and workspace-scoped stdio MCP server.	Static linter for CLAUDE.md-style agent constitution files: 10 operational-guardrail checks.
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "katana-markdown-linter": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "--yes",
        "katana-markdown-linter@0.19.4"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "constitution-lint": {
      "url": "https://www.agentopskit.dev/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons