Kaneo vs Voting MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Kaneo and Voting MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Kaneo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kaneo Details

Choose Voting MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: borda, copeland, condorcet.

Explore Voting MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Kaneo Workplace & Productivity	Voting MCP Workplace & Productivity
Summary	Official MCP server for Kaneo: manage tasks, projects, and labels from Claude and other MCP clients	Social-choice voting rules (Borda, Copeland, Condorcet, STV, opinion pool) as MCP tools.
Category & Scope	Workplace & Productivity	Workplace & Productivity

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kaneo": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@kaneo/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "voting-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "voting-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons