Home Browse Entroly vs Distil Entroly vs Distil Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.
Compare Summary Auditable context control plane and MCP server for AI coding agents. Compresses context 70–95% (BM25 + entropy + dep-graph knapsack), stabilizes prompt prefixes for provider cache discounts, routes easy tasks to cheaper models (RAVS Bayesian router), and verifies answers locally with WITNESS hallucination guard (0.844 AUROC, $0, 3 ms). MemoryOS adds local budget-aware working/episodic/semantic memory with decay, safety scanning, and durable persistence. 38 agent integrations (Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Aider, and more). Ships as MCP server (entroly serve), HTTP proxy, or Python/Rust library. Apache-2.0, local-first. pip install entroly Reversibly compress a large tool output to a recoverable 8-hex handle over stdio, expand it on demand, and report a local token/dollar savings ledger. Quality signal 24/100 (Emerging) 23/100 (Emerging) Install path pip · highuvx · highEngagement 0 0 0 0 0 0 11Tools Not listed yet Not listed yet Verified / official No No Open listing View Entroly View Distil
Other servers like Entroly