Readystack MCP vs Lr Labs
A side-by-side look at the Readystack MCP and Lr Labs MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Readystack MCP for legal work as a local process; choose Lr Labs for legal over a hosted endpoint. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Readystack MCP when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
- You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
- Its auth model fits you: No auth required.
Choose Lr Labs when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
- You prefer a remote HTTP/SSE transport.
- You want tools like
analyze_cross_border_tax, screen_transfer_pricing, verify_tax_research_note.
Feature & specification comparison
Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Legal | Legal |
| Quality signal | 49/100 · Fair | 48/100 · Fair |
| Install command | Confirmed | Confirmed |
| Transport | Local subprocess (stdio) | Remote HTTP/SSE |
| Auth | No auth required | Not declared |
| Pricing | Freemium | Not declared |
| Required env vars | None listed | None listed |
| Verified owner | Community listing | Community listing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Directory activity | 0 views 0 installs 0 upvotes | 1 views 0 installs 0 upvotes |
| Tools | Not listed | 4 |
| Full listing | View Readystack MCP | View Lr Labs |
Tools & capabilities
Readystack MCP tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Lr Labs tools 4
analyze_cross_border_taxPermanent-establishment exposure and Indian tax liability for a treaty pair — the condition tree, the GIVEN set, deciding facts, the GAAR gate, authoritiesscreen_transfer_pricingSafe harbour (Rule 10TD), documentation thresholds (Rule 10D), method eligibility, tested party, the 35th–65th percentile rangeverify_tax_research_noteAny tax analysis, checked against compiled law — citations resolved, thresholds and temporal claims verifiedlist_compiled_corridorsHonest coverage: what the engine can and cannot answer
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Readystack MCP
{
"mcpServers": {
"jmshinhwa-readystack-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@readystack/k8s-removed-api-lint"
]
}
}
}
Lr Labs
{
"mcpServers": {
"lr-labs": {
"url": "https://lrlabs.ai/mcp"
}
}
}
Frequently asked questions
Readystack MCP is categorized under Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. Lr Labs belongs to Legal and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Pick Readystack MCP for legal work and Lr Labs for legal.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Readystack MCP is listed as freemium — a free tier with paid plans. Auth: no auth required. Lr Labs has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add jmshinhwa-readystack-mcp and lr-labs as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Readystack MCP has a quality signal of 49/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. Lr Labs has 48/100 (Fair) with 1 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.