MCP Chess vs Onepiece Oracle

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Chess and Onepiece Oracle MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Chess when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Chess gameplay through MCP tools, Board visualization with color-based orientation, Legal move generation in UCI notation.

Explore MCP Chess Details

Choose Onepiece Oracle when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_cards, browse_sets, card_versions.

Explore Onepiece Oracle Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Chess jiayao Gaming	Onepiece Oracle gregario Gaming
Summary	A MCP server playing chess against LLMs.	One Piece TCG card search, deck analysis, cost curves, leader browsing, and counter strategy tools. 6 tools, 4,348 cards embedded.
Category & Scope	Gaming

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "jiayao-mcp-chess": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-chess"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gregario-onepiece-oracle": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "onepiece-oracle"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons