JDataMunch MCP vs Letin: Power Query (M)

In-depth architectural comparison of the JDataMunch MCP and Letin: Power Query (M) MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose JDataMunch MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore JDataMunch MCP Details

L

Choose Letin: Power Query (M) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Letin: Power Query (M) Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	JDataMunch MCP Workplace & Productivity	L Letin: Power Query (M) Workplace & Productivity
Summary	Tabular data retrieval. Index CSV/Excel, query rows, aggregate. 99%+ savings vs raw file reads.	Inspect, refactor, lint, run and version Power Query (M) in Excel workbooks and Power BI projects.
Category & Scope	Workplace & Productivity	Workplace & Productivity

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "jdatamunch-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "jdatamunch-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "letin-power-query-m": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "letin-power-query-m"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons