Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Jd Intel MCP vs Telnyx
In-depth architectural comparison of the Jd Intel MCP and Telnyx MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Jd Intel MCP
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 55/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Telnyx
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 48/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Jd Intel MCP if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Telnyx if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
J
Choose Jd Intel MCP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
- Primary tools included: fetch_jobs, search_registry, detect_ats.
T
Choose Telnyx when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Jd Intel MCP Tools (3)
fetch_jobs
Get open roles at a company with filters for role type, topic, location, and recency
search_registry
Find companies by name or sector
detect_ats
Identify which ATS platform a company uses
Telnyx Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Jd Intel MCP Configuration
Telnyx Configuration