Claude Debugs For You vs Raxol

In-depth architectural comparison of the Claude Debugs For You and Raxol MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Claude Debugs For You when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Interactive breakpoint debugging, Runtime expression evaluation, Conditional breakpoint support.

Explore Claude Debugs For You Details

Choose Raxol when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Automatic MCP tools for interactive components, TEA application model backed by an OTP GenServer, Terminal, Phoenix LiveView, SSH, and agent rendering.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Claude Debugs For You jasonjmcghee Developer Tools	Raxol Developer Tools
Summary	An MCP Server and VS Code Extension which enables (language agnostic) automatic debugging via breakpoints and expression evaluation.	Elixir/OTP runtime where every UI component auto-exposes MCP tools; stdio server: mix mcp.server
Category & Scope	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "jasonjmcghee-claude-debugs-for-you": {
      "url": "https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/build-with-claude/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "raxol": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "raxol"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons