Lazaretto Mcp vs Vet

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
Lazaretto Mcp logo
Lazaretto Mcp
jamesdfinance-dev
🔒 Security
Vet logo
Vet
safedep
🔒 Security
SummaryCheck whether anything you depend on is known malware, before an agent installs it. checklockfile takes a package-lock.json, yarn.lock or pnpm-lock.yaml and matches every pinned version against published malicious-package advisories in one call, free and with no API key, catching compromised releases like chalk@5.6.1 while leaving their clean releases alone. scanartifact adds deterministic behavioral analysis (no LLM in the serving path) for credential theft, exfiltration, obfuscation, prompt injection and install-time droppers, with the file, line and evidence that triggered it; verdicts are SHA-256-bound so you can re-verify what landed on disk. Paid scans settle at $0.03 USDC on Base (x402) or prepaid credits. npx lazaretto-mcpvet-mcp checks open source packages—like those suggested by AI coding tools—for vulnerabilities and malicious code. It supports npm and PyPI, and runs locally via Docker or as a standalone binary for fast, automated vetting.
Quality signal51/100 (Fair)52/100 (Fair)
Install pathRemote · highRemote · high
Engagement 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1,096
Toolsknown_bad_lookupscan_artifactReal-time malicious package detection via SafeDep CloudVulnerability analysis based on dependency usage evidencePolicy-as-code enforcement with CEL expressionsSupports npm, PyPI, Maven, Go, Ruby, Rust, PHP ecosystemsScans container images and SBOMsOutputs actionable reports in multiple formats
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView Lazaretto McpView Vet
More alternatives to Lazaretto McpMore alternatives to VetSecurity category

Other servers like Lazaretto Mcp