Iso20022 Readiness Suite MCP vs Build

In-depth architectural comparison of the Iso20022 Readiness Suite MCP and Build MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

I

Choose Iso20022 Readiness Suite MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_profiles, run_readiness_check, remediate_payload.

Explore Iso20022 Readiness Suite MCP Details

Choose Build when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Schema-validated structured JSON output, Human-readable MCP content output, TypeScript compiler support.

Explore Build Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	I Iso20022 Readiness Suite MCP Developer Tools	Build Developer Tools
Summary	Orchestration MCP server: ISO 20022 readiness scoring, remediation, bank-response simulation.	Structured build tool output (tsc, generic commands) as typed JSON diagnostics.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "iso20022-readiness-suite-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "iso20022-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "build": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@paretools/init"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons