MCP Gdrive vs Filesystem Context MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Gdrive and Filesystem Context MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Gdrive when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the File Systems domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Description, Output.

Explore MCP Gdrive Details

Choose Filesystem Context MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the File Systems domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_roots, list, find_files.

Explore Filesystem Context MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Gdrive isaacphi File Systems	Filesystem Context MCP Server j0hanz File Systems
Summary	Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server for reading from Google Drive and editing Google Sheets.	Read-only MCP server for secure filesystem exploration, searching, and analysis with symlink protection.
Category & Scope	File Systems

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "isaacphi-mcp-gdrive": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@isaacphi/mcp-gdrive"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "j0hanz-filesystem-context-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@j0hanz/filesystem-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons